Difference between revisions of "Shared:Rhizome2References"

From cs
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center">
 
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center">
 
[[Shared:Rhizome2References|'''References''']]
 
[[Shared:Rhizome2References|'''References''']]
 +
</div>
 +
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center">
 +
[[Shared:Rhizome2KickOff|'''Kick-off''']]
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center">
 
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center">
Line 20: Line 23:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
<br>
 
=== '''References''' ===
 
=== '''References''' ===
 +
 +
 +
'''1. Printing with cement-less concrete'''
 +
 +
Coppola et al, Binder Alternative to Portland Cement and waste management for sustainable construction, 2018 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29996741/]
 +
 +
Dada, Influence of temperature on the rheological behaviour of eco-mortar, 2021
 +
[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349412837_Influence_of_temperature_on_the_rheological_behaviour_of_eco-mortar_with_binary_and_ternary_cementitious_blends_of_natural_pozzolana_and_marble_powder]
 +
 +
Djobo et al, Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 4433–4446 (2017). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8230-8]
 +
 +
Liu et al, In-situ resources for infrastructure construction on Mars: A review, 2021 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.02.001]
 +
 +
Nazneen et al, Geopolymer: A potential alternative binder for the sustainable development of concrete without ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Industrial Pollution Con-trol, 2017, pages 1500-1504. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/GEOPOLYMER-A-POTENTIAL-ALTERNATIVE-BINDER-FOR-THE-Nazneen-Daggubati/b1095cd5b0f0354e254a7498138327d64960a4a5]
 +
 +
Schiavone et al, Pozzolan Based 3D Printing Composites From the Formulation, 2020
 +
[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347958624_Pozzolan_Based_3D_Printing_Composites_From_the_Formulation_Till_the_Final_Application_in_the_Precision_Irrigation_Field]
 +
 +
The Schumacher centre, Alternatives to Portland Cement
 +
[https://www.ctc-n.org/sites/www.ctc-n.org/files/resources/4f561ad5-a0a8-4210-adfb-4b030ae4f5bb.pdf]
 +
 +
 +
'''2. In Situ Printing and (AI & HRI supported) in situ assembly of 3D printed components'''
 +
 +
NASA 3D Printed Habitat Challenge: Hassell Studio [https://www.hassellstudio.com/project/nasa-3d-printed-habitat-challenge#:~:text=Our%20aim%20was%20to%20bring,the%20history%20of%20space%20exploration.]
 +
<br>
 +
 +
Overview In-Situ 3D Printing References: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x5olV95jEBAba6_DBVIs7JwtqjblT1-l/view?usp=share_link In-Situ 3D Printing References]
 +
 +
ISRU-BASED ROBOTIC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR AND MARTIAN INFRASTRUCTURES [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347508732_ISRU-BASED_ROBOTIC_CONSTRUCTION_TECHNOLOGIES_FOR_LUNAR_AND_MARTIAN_INFRASTRUCTURES_NIAC_Phase_II_Final_Report]
 +
 +
 +
 +
'''3. (AI supported) Environment Control'''
 +
 +
Climate-Resilient Robotic Facades: Architectural Strategies to Improve Thermal Comfort in Outdoor Urban Environments using Robotic Assembly
 +
[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2022.856871/full]
 +
 +
 +
 +
'''4. CV- and AI-supported Applications in CS and UF'''
 +
 +
MSc 2 IA Studio 2023: Rhizome 2.0
 +
[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OzG7hewpTbX9HBkPTJcmHw1rJeBDbkm8/view?usp=drive_link]

Latest revision as of 14:17, 30 October 2023


Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats


References

1. Printing with cement-less concrete

Coppola et al, Binder Alternative to Portland Cement and waste management for sustainable construction, 2018 [1]

Dada, Influence of temperature on the rheological behaviour of eco-mortar, 2021 [2]

Djobo et al, Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 4433–4446 (2017). [3]

Liu et al, In-situ resources for infrastructure construction on Mars: A review, 2021 [4]

Nazneen et al, Geopolymer: A potential alternative binder for the sustainable development of concrete without ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Industrial Pollution Con-trol, 2017, pages 1500-1504. [5]

Schiavone et al, Pozzolan Based 3D Printing Composites From the Formulation, 2020 [6]

The Schumacher centre, Alternatives to Portland Cement [7]


2. In Situ Printing and (AI & HRI supported) in situ assembly of 3D printed components

NASA 3D Printed Habitat Challenge: Hassell Studio [8]

Overview In-Situ 3D Printing References: In-Situ 3D Printing References

ISRU-BASED ROBOTIC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR AND MARTIAN INFRASTRUCTURES [9]


3. (AI supported) Environment Control

Climate-Resilient Robotic Facades: Architectural Strategies to Improve Thermal Comfort in Outdoor Urban Environments using Robotic Assembly [10]


4. CV- and AI-supported Applications in CS and UF

MSc 2 IA Studio 2023: Rhizome 2.0 [11]